Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 9:40 am
In Middle Age, ye church didn't approve o' other religions or types o' Christianity and burned their followships. Thou sounded that like.
DOS Games Discussion
A message board to talk about DOS games, get help, and find old games.
https://dosgames.com./forum/
Religion.
Page 8 of 11
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 10:12 am
What? You're still not making any sense.
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 11:43 am
Is word 'inquisition' familiar?
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:02 pm
john: he said they burned anyone of a different religion at the stake back then.
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 2:40 pm
religion at the stake back then
Thanks for words K0.
Thanks for words K0.
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 3:01 pm
???. They just burned anyone at the stake, just because of there religion? Would the Church go out and burn a King at the stake, because he didn't believe everything the Church believed?
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 4:36 pm
Yes. The Pope had more power than the King, so he was usually just a puppet of the church anyway...
(Recall the protestent barbeque queen "Bloody" Mary was having a couple centuries back)
(Recall the protestent barbeque queen "Bloody" Mary was having a couple centuries back)
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 5:07 pm
I said a King, not the King. Would they burn any king?
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 5:12 pm
(Psssst! "The King would be a general reference to any European King in power, sir)
They would burn 'im if one didn't obey the church. This "Obedience" would include sending money to the church, giving church athorities power in the government, burning heretics, enforcing laws that "the Church" imposed, etc. Of course, since the church appointed the King anyway, it didn't happend very often.
They would burn 'im if one didn't obey the church. This "Obedience" would include sending money to the church, giving church athorities power in the government, burning heretics, enforcing laws that "the Church" imposed, etc. Of course, since the church appointed the King anyway, it didn't happend very often.
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 5:48 pm
Hmmmm... The church sucked back then. 
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 6:24 pm
Uhuh, the Catholic church has yet to fully recover from the atrocities commited then.
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 6:26 pm
Sorry to butt into such a heated discussion, I just wanted somebody to know something.
Okay, carry on.
Well, I don't know which one TD linked to (I didn't look), but Efftor comics are like all comics: some are funny, some are just plain stupid, and some are too controversial for their own good. Elftor is more like South Park than Bugs Bunny, though, when comparing comics to cartoons.Dogbreath wrote:I deleted the Elftor comments… they were unnecessary and cruel.
Okay, carry on.
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 6:31 pm
This piticular one was mocking Christians and referring to them in deregitory terms. If it was non-offencive, I would have allowed it.
Thunderdog: You need to 1. at least have some respect for my faith like Unknown K does, or 2. shut the fuck up.
Thunderdog: You need to 1. at least have some respect for my faith like Unknown K does, or 2. shut the fuck up.
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 6:33 pm
Naw. I would prefer 3.: I kill you.
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 6:37 pm
So you would resort to murdering a person because he doesn't follow your faith and wouldn't be bullied into silence by you? Sorry, sir, this has already been done. (Crusades/Jihads/Middle East terrorism)
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 7:06 pm
TD, your just digging a bigger ditch to fall in. What's with the "kill everyone", thing?
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 7:13 pm
Trolling, most likely.
troll1 (trl)
v. trolled, troll·ing, trolls
v. tr.
1.
a. To fish for by trailing a baited line from behind a slowly moving boat.
Wheras, his remarks are the bait and we accept it if we flame him. He's attempting to make us react. It isn't tolerated here so I've been deleting most of his offencive posts.
Either that or he really does wish to murder people because of their beliefs... in which case, threatening users isn't tolerated either.
troll1 (trl)
v. trolled, troll·ing, trolls
v. tr.
1.
a. To fish for by trailing a baited line from behind a slowly moving boat.
Wheras, his remarks are the bait and we accept it if we flame him. He's attempting to make us react. It isn't tolerated here so I've been deleting most of his offencive posts.
Either that or he really does wish to murder people because of their beliefs... in which case, threatening users isn't tolerated either.
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 7:26 pm
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but isn't it spelled "offensive"? That's how I always saw it spelled.
Edit: Yes, though at the moment I am thinking of a word spelled T-E-C-H-N-O-C-R-A-T. -Ze Mighty Man of Foul Canine Oral Excretions
Edit: Yes, though at the moment I am thinking of a word spelled T-E-C-H-N-O-C-R-A-T. -Ze Mighty Man of Foul Canine Oral Excretions
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 7:27 pm
What's funny is that the crusades were the biggest waste of time ever. Absoulty nothing was accomplished.
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2003 7:36 pm
It drastically lowered the population of the Middle East and raised the average IQ of Europe's population so it wasn't a total loss...