Why we disagree with 486' Old English

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Tue Nov 25, 2003 10:47 am

I've VERY low treshold and it Hurts dost I look or not! Fourtanetly aneshtic plasters are invented.

Check-Mate · Post by **Check-Mate** » Tue Nov 25, 2003 2:27 pm

486 player wrote:I've VERY low treshold and it Hurts dost I look or not! Fourtanetly aneshtic plasters are invented.

Wow....could you speak any less english...you know it was very difficult to understand what you were talking about.....Why don't you try re-reading your posts to see if they make any sense before posting.

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 12:52 pm

Maybe level's a right word instead o' treshold. Better dictionary's with lil' sister in capitol, thou know. and those plasters take's off perception o' pain in limited time.

Thunderdog · Post by **Thunderdog** » Wed Nov 26, 2003 10:30 pm

*Check-Mate* wrote:
486 player wrote:I've VERY low treshold and it Hurts dost I look or not! Fourtanetly aneshtic plasters are invented.
Wow....could you speak any less english...you know it was very difficult to understand what you were talking about.....Why don't you try re-reading your posts to see if they make any sense before posting.

Forgive him.... He knows english perfectly well, he just seems to think that people needing to "Translate" his posts is necessary. Once he turns around 9 or 10, I think He'll start to grow up.

Splodginator · Post by **Splodginator** » Thu Nov 27, 2003 1:01 am

I translated it back, and this is what I got:

Maybe level is a better word than instead of threshold. Better dictionary is with little sister in capitol, you know. And those plasters take is off perception of pain in limited time.

I didn't really get the last sentence.

Post by **Dogbreath** » Fri Nov 28, 2003 1:26 am

486 player wrote:I've VERY low treshold and it Hurts dost I look or not! Fourtanetly aneshtic plasters are invented.

Meh, let me give it a spin, Splod-

"I have a very low threshold for pain, and it hurts no matter when I look at it. [Trans: The meaning behind this may be "it doesn't matter if I look at it or not"] Fortunately, there are such things as anestetic plasters. {Trans: Anistetic plasters-a slap on bandaid type doo-hicky that directly injects painkillers into ones system upon taking a shot-at least I assume so, never seen any.

]"

Check-Mate · Post by **Check-Mate** » Fri Nov 28, 2003 10:59 pm

Thunderdog wrote:
*Check-Mate* wrote:
486 player wrote:I've VERY low treshold and it Hurts dost I look or not! Fourtanetly aneshtic plasters are invented.
Wow....could you speak any less english...you know it was very difficult to understand what you were talking about.....Why don't you try re-reading your posts to see if they make any sense before posting.
Forgive him.... He knows english perfectly well, he just seems to think that people needing to "Translate" his posts is necessary. Once he turns around 9 or 10, I think He'll start to grow up.

A ha haha....you actually made me laugh....

John The Ax · Post by **John The Ax** » Sat Nov 29, 2003 5:28 pm

Little kids typing with no skills lifeka thial;ds can be easier to read than him.

Check-Mate · Post by **Check-Mate** » Sat Nov 29, 2003 5:41 pm

God, that's so true

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Sun Nov 30, 2003 11:58 am

I'm not a spammer but, I've written many times that I HAST born in '80! It's Dog's readed-below-lines-misunderstand. I started to use 'thou's in grade 1 o' high school. If English had a word to speak to single person, I'd use it.

Thunderdog wrote:he just seems to think that people needing to "Translate" his posts is necessary.

English doesn't translated by word to word

. That's what people thinks asbergers wants to. They're so frank.

Those plasters are available in drug-stores.

Kazer0 · Post by **Kazer0** » Sun Nov 30, 2003 2:50 pm

486 player wrote:English doesn't translated by word to word . That's what people thinks asbergers wants to. They're so frank.

Those plasters are available in drug-stores.

Ok... what?

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Sun Nov 30, 2003 2:59 pm

Forget it.

Post by **Dogbreath** » Sun Nov 30, 2003 3:00 pm

Bah, I'm not even going to translate that one... *wonders if he should make it a bannible offence to spout nonsense like 486 Player*

John The Ax · Post by **John The Ax** » Mon Dec 01, 2003 7:36 pm

Uh, 486, if you used 'you' people would understand you. When you speak in olde english, no one can understand you. DB, make it a bannable offence.

486 player · Post by **486 player** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 3:51 am

Then it means that I'm banned.

Kazer0 · Post by **Kazer0** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 10:13 am

What, no thees or thous in that sentance?

Oz · Post by Oz » Wed Dec 03, 2003 1:46 pm

can you guys give it a rest? 486 player posted a topic about this and no-one seemed to object then. he is using old english because new english is fucked up. in fact, anyone who has had to lean english as a language will agree: english makes no use of logic or rules. if you want to complain about this, don't do it in the needles topic.

*warywolf makes a citizen's lock*

Post by **Dogbreath** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 2:27 pm

486/JTA: FWIW, I was totally joking about making it a "bannible offence" (I get about 2 PMs a day from Wally asking me to ban TD so consider it an inside joke) and yes, I know how to speak old English perfectly-hell I studied it for half a year. I don't mind Thou or Dost or Thee (being a spanish student I understand his plea-at least in spanish we have a difference between Tu/Usted (singular you) and Ustedes (plural you)), but 486 player doesn't even use proper English grammer-he just rambles on in his own way expecting everyone else to take the time to translate it into something that makes sense.

So essentially, I disagree with his language for the same reason I disagree with 133753@|<, it just makes reading harder for no apparent logical reason. (FWIW, the English mind can derive the context of "you" in either plural or singular form in a paragraph with no problem-much like a spanish person can know the difference between es (it is) and es (is it?) by tone of voice in spoken language)

However, if 486 would speak in modern English grammer (I'll assume it's his original language so it should be inherent) I have no problem with thee and thou.

Kazer0 · Post by **Kazer0** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 2:50 pm

Oz: Fine, we won't post about it in the needles topic.

Oz · Post by Oz » Wed Dec 03, 2003 4:58 pm

oh jeez.... i give up.

fine, if four-eighy-sixer isn't gonna speak proper old english, ban him. but we'll have to ban wally for not speaking proper new english.